Doubling General Aviation Revenue in Four Weeks: A Growth Strategy for a Regional UK Airport
Outcomes
- Growth opportunities identified within 4 weeks to double existing General Aviation revenue and double the airport’s share of the value chain
- New commercial model designed to monetise previously uncharged services, directly improving margin
- Redefined customer proposition developed to recapture market share lost to competing airports
- Strategic partnership framework proposed to extend the airport’s service offering across onward travel, concierge, and retail
Our Client
A regional UK airport operating a General Aviation (GA) facility, losing ground to competing airports offering a superior service proposition. The client was providing services to its incumbent Fixed Base Operator (FBO) at no cost, carrying high operational overheads, and had limited visibility of what its customers actually needed.
Background
The airport’s GA operation was significantly underperforming its commercial potential. Services were being provided to the incumbent FBO without charge, creating an immediate and unnecessary margin gap. Customer understanding was weak, facilities were outdated, and the transit experience was poor. Competing airports were actively capturing market share by offering a stronger overall proposition. Poor pilot and broker behaviours were adding to operational costs with no mechanism in place to address them. The client needed a rapid, commercially grounded strategy to reverse the trend.
Curzon Approach
Curzon conducted a rapid commercial diagnostic and growth strategy across four areas:
Commercial Model Redesign — Previously uncharged services were identified and priced, including marshalling. Cancellation charges were introduced to drive improved pilot and broker behaviour and reduce unnecessary operational cost.
Customer Journey Redesign — The end-to-end customer experience was reviewed and redesigned to address the factors driving market share loss to competing airports, with facility improvements proposed to bring the lounge and transit experience up to a competitive standard.
Value Chain Extension — Affiliated third parties were identified to provide onward travel and concierge services, broadening the revenue base and capturing a greater share of the GA value chain. A discrete duty-free offering was also proposed to further enhance yield per customer.
Partnership Strategy — Existing partnerships and commercial arrangements were reviewed, with changes proposed to practices and third-party relationships to support the new commercial model.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
Building a High-Performing Project Management Community: 5,000+ Hours of Capability Development Across a £23bn Infrastructure Programme
Outcomes
- Full programme rolled out to 730 project management professionals across a £23bn infrastructure portfolio
- 5,049 hours of remote learning delivered across 122 people in 9 project teams in the initial phase, covering a combined portfolio value of £3.3bn
- 89% of participants reported increased understanding and confidence in project controls; 86% in commerciality; 84% in project and programme management
- 69.6% increase in participants’ confidence in applying learning directly to their projects
- 64.8% increase in participants’ capability to successfully deliver projects based on programme content
- 100% of participants who completed the behavioural strengths assessment reported they could now play a role in creating a high-performing project team
- Digital Project Management Guidebook launched to 300+ employees, generating 1,000+ unique viewers
- 100,000 hours of on-site experience harvested and made digitally available across the project management community
Our Client
A government-owned national infrastructure authority responsible for operating, maintaining, and improving a major national road network. The client’s major project programmes covered 80 projects worth more than £23bn, each delivered by supply chain and contractor teams led by internal project management functions.
Background
Inconsistent performance, delivery delays, and scope and budget overruns were endemic across the client’s project portfolio. A deeply siloed organisation meant departments and technical functions lacked collaboration and a shared view of primary objectives. Existing capability development programmes were too theoretical, focused on processes and systems rather than people, and were not translating into improved delivery on the ground. The client needed a fundamentally different approach — one that would shift culture, build genuine capability, and produce measurable improvement in project outcomes across a diverse and complex portfolio.
Curzon Approach
Curzon was engaged to interpret and structure the client’s vision for its Project Performance Accelerator programme into clear deliverables, and to co-create and deliver two products: an Immersive Learning Experience and a Digital Project Management Guidebook.
Immersive Learning Experience — Designed to disrupt conventional programme delivery, the learner journey took project teams through 16 hours of pre-learning, a behavioural strengths assessment, personalised coaching, a five-day immersive learning week, and two bespoke checkpoint workshops to embed knowledge. The curriculum was built around the full project lifecycle and adapted to different learning styles, covering project controls, commercial acumen, contractor management, risk, and ways of working. When the Covid-19 pandemic made in-person delivery impossible, Curzon rapidly redesigned the entire programme for remote delivery — without compromising learning outcomes or pace of rollout — and successfully completed the full rollout to all 730 target participants.
Digital Project Management Guidebook — A fully interactive digital tool giving the entire project management community on-demand access to practical, hard-earned insight from experienced practitioners. Curzon led content creation alongside the client’s subject matter experts, adopting a divide-and-conquer approach to safeguard client ownership while ensuring consistency and relevance across programmes. The Guidebook deliberately avoided duplicating existing manuals — instead curating the best available material into a single, accessible resource validated with senior stakeholders across the organisation.
A “working better together” model underpinned both products, driving a fundamental shift in how individuals interact, take ownership of overlapping workstreams, and solve problems collaboratively — moving the focus from systems and processes to people.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
"Game-Changing" Independent Validation of the Target Operating Model for Europe's Largest Infrastructure Programme
Outcomes
- All recommendations adopted by the Steering Group for rapid action — a 100% adoption rate
- Deployment roadmap adapted based on findings, accelerating operationalisation
- Client described the recommendations as “game changing, equipping them to have the right conversations with stakeholders, and deliver an effective TOM”
- Critical gaps identified and addressed across a TOM underpinning a 555km high-speed rail programme
Our Client
The future owner and operator of Europe’s largest infrastructure programme — a 555km high-speed rail line connecting the North and South of England. The client had developed a Target Operating Model (TOM) over three years outlining the capabilities required to operate and maintain the railway, and needed independent validation before operationalisation.
Background
The TOM had been developed internally over three years and represented a significant body of work. However, the Executive team required independent challenge to confirm it was comprehensive, robust, and fit for purpose — and guidance on specific areas posing operational challenges as they moved toward implementation. The scale and complexity of the programme meant the cost of gaps or blind spots in the TOM was extremely high.
Curzon Approach
Curzon adopted a red-team approach, drawing on senior executives with experience across multiple sectors to conduct a thorough, targeted review of the TOM and all underpinning artefacts. A series of immersive workshops and engagements with subject matter experts identified thematic areas for focus, which formed the basis of recommendations. Cross-sector benchmarks were used to enrich outputs and provide alternative approaches for TOM components. Bespoke case studies and models were generated to underpin recommendations and give the Executive team practical reference points for action.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
85% Scope 1 & 2 Emissions Reduction and 90% Fleet Decarbonisation: Delivering a Sustainability Roadmap for a Major UK Airport
Outcomes
- 85% reduction in Scope 1 & 2 emissions by 2030 — exceeding initial targets
- 90% reduction in fleet emissions achieved following strategy deployment
- 100+ sustainability initiatives evaluated and prioritised
- Renewable energy plan established covering 50% of electricity needs by 2030
- Geothermal heating, energy-efficient utility systems, and advanced fleet transition strategies embedded
Our Client
A major UK airport with ambitious sustainability commitments: 80% emissions reduction and a zero-emission fleet by 2030, Net Zero by 2040, a 50% reduction in potable water consumption, and a circular economy waste model. The client lacked a clear strategy to achieve these targets and had no benchmarking against peer airports.
Background
The airport had set ambitious targets but had no execution strategy, no benchmarking against UK or European peers, and significant uncertainty among decision-makers about how to transition operations while continuing to deliver commercially. Over 100 potential sustainability initiatives existed with no framework to prioritise them by financial ROI, carbon impact, or operational feasibility.
Curzon Approach
Curzon delivered across four areas: Strategic Benchmarking — a comparative analysis of sustainability performance against peer UK and European airports established a baseline and identified gaps. Initiative Prioritisation — all 100+ initiatives were evaluated and prioritised using robust business cases detailing financial ROI, carbon savings, and operational implications. Sustainability Roadmap — a phased strategy was designed to meet 2030 and 2040 goals, with milestones aligned to sustainability targets and flexibility to incorporate emerging technologies (including hydrogen solutions post-2025). Implementation Plan — detailed plans were developed for all initiatives, covering timelines, dependencies, and required investments, underpinned by a unified governance framework to ensure stakeholder alignment and accountability. A lifecycle-based fleet transition strategy incorporating drop-in bio-fuel was implemented to enable phased vehicle replacement and immediate emissions reductions.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
Restoring Investor Confidence and Delivering Cost Certainty Across a £20bn+ Nuclear Programme
Outcomes
- £465m private/public partnership sustained through a transformed PMO
- 33% increase in PMO High Performing Team attributes
- 34 business-critical initiatives executed and embedded
- 100+ workflows redesigned, aligned across 50+ senior stakeholder requirements
- Renewed investor and stakeholder confidence restored through transparent governance and communication
Our Client
A UK nuclear programme PMO overseeing a £20bn+ deployment portfolio. Confidence in the PMO had been eroded to the point where the programme’s ability to deliver was being called into question by investors and external stakeholders.
Background
The PMO had inherited outdated, disjointed workflows from a parent company that were not fit for purpose at nuclear programme scale. Governance structures were unclear, decision-making roles were poorly defined, and escalation paths were absent. Integration across cost, design, schedule, and risk management was failing. Stakeholder trust — critical for a privately/publicly funded programme of this complexity — had been significantly damaged, putting the entire programme at risk.
Curzon Approach
Curzon delivered a four-workstream transformation: Process Redesign — 100+ workflows were redesigned and implemented, unified across 50+ senior stakeholder requirements. Governance Framework — Robust decision-making structures, accountability mechanisms, and escalation pathways were implemented, improving cross-functional integration across cost, programme, and risk. Capability Uplift — High-Performing Teams (HPT) methodology and strengths-centric coaching were deployed to build PMO team capability, with 1-1 coaching accelerating individual development. Digital Strategy — A bespoke PMO intranet platform and digital suite were designed, built, and embedded, alongside a defined future-state digital strategy. A strategic transformation plan covering 74 initiatives across critical capability areas was created and delivered.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
£70m in Assured Savings and a 30% Productivity Uplift: Digital Transformation of a National Road Infrastructure Programme
Outcomes
- £70m in assured cost savings delivered during the RIS2 period (2020–2025), with hundreds of millions projected in RIS3
- 30% productivity improvement achieved
- 5,000 shifts logged using a custom-built digital productivity app
- 500 employees trained on digital tools
- Supply chain buy-in secured for collaborative data capture, enabling consistent benchmarking across assets
Our Client
A national road infrastructure body responsible for a major capital delivery programme, struggling with declining productivity, inconsistent project management standards, and limited real-time data to support decision-making.
Background
Productivity in the UK construction sector had increased by only 10% over two decades, compared to 30% across other industries. The client was experiencing project delivery failures — overspends, delays, and skills gaps among project managers — compounded by the absence of standardised productivity metrics or real-time data. Without consistent benchmarks, there was no basis for performance management or proactive issue resolution across the programme.
Curzon Approach
Curzon delivered a digital productivity transformation across five workstreams: standardised productivity metrics and baselines were established for key assets; a custom productivity app and dashboard were built to collect, analyse, and visualise real-time data; a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) was developed to define strategic goals and scheme-level targets; Productivity Optimisation Groups were formed to align supply chain goals with client objectives; and training, coaching, and change management were delivered to embed the new tools and ways of working. AI was used to accelerate insight generation throughout. Structured data feedback loops facilitated continuous improvement and enhanced supplier engagement through actionable insight.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
Cutting Customer Minutes Lost and Reducing OPEX: Operational Turnaround for a Major UK Electricity Distribution Network
Outcomes
- £0.6m–£1.1m reduction in Customer Minutes Lost (CML) penalties
- 15–20% annual savings from reduction in CML
- Underperforming regions brought into alignment with top-performing areas, driving consistency across the network
- Fault resolution times improved through optimised staffing, targeted interventions, and enhanced resource allocation
Our Client
A major UK Electricity Distribution Network Operator (DNO) facing rising regulatory penalties, escalating costs, and operational inefficiencies across fault management and resource deployment.
Background
The client was experiencing escalating Customer Minutes Lost, triggering increasing regulatory penalties and profit erosion. Fault attendance was delayed by inefficient processes and governance failures. Resource mismatches — including skill imbalances and insufficient out-of-hours coverage — were slowing resolution times. Cultural resistance to change was hampering improvement efforts, and no robust performance management framework existed to drive accountability or track progress.
Curzon Approach
Curzon conducted a comprehensive statistical review of historical operational data to identify inefficiencies and establish evidence-based intervention points. Five workstreams were delivered:
Root Cause Analysis — Historical operational data was used to pinpoint the drivers of fault delays and long-duration outages. Resourcing Optimisation — Workforce distribution was rebalanced across shifts to address the highest-impact gaps. 24/7 Fault Management — Field assessment and reservoir development processes were streamlined for operational efficiency and accuracy. Process Automation — Emergency response protocols were redesigned and automated workflows introduced to reduce delays. Performance KPIs — Measurable KPIs were established to enhance accountability and track improvement over time.
Leadership buy-in was secured at executive level, ensuring alignment with strategic priorities, and continuous monitoring frameworks were embedded to sustain improvements.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
$15m in Annualised Savings in Under 12 Months: Transforming Procurement at a Major International Airport
Outcomes
- $15m in annualised savings delivered, representing 11% of $136m targeted category spend — achieved within 12 months
- Savings delivered across seven categories: Technology Software (33% saving), Technology Hardware (10%), Transport (15%), Hard FM (11%), Airport Specialist (12%), Soft FM (7%), and Passenger Services (4%)
- Supplier base rationalised to reduce fragmentation, drive economies of scale, and simplify contract management
- Contract managers upskilled through three tailored training sessions, embedding a partnership mindset and improving relationship management
- Digital-first issue reporting introduced via a priority-based app, streamlining escalation and resolution
- Supplier night work reduced following endorsement of a supplier-led proposal — improving workforce safety and wellbeing
Our Client
A major international airport (Southern Hemisphere) with significant operational scale and a fragmented supplier base across FM, technology, transport, and specialist airport services. The client needed to meaningfully reduce its Total Cost of Operations while improving service quality and supplier accountability.
Background
The airport was carrying significant procurement inefficiency across its supplier base — fragmented contracts, over-specified requirements, poor demand management, and limited commercial rigour in supplier negotiations. Contract managers lacked the skills and confidence to challenge suppliers or drive accountability. The client needed a structured, multi-lever approach that would deliver hard savings quickly while building the internal capability to sustain them.
Curzon Approach
Curzon deployed a two-phase approach over approximately 16 weeks:
Phase 1 — Spend Transparency and Opportunity Assessment (c.7 weeks): We mapped spend across all targeted categories, identified inefficiencies, and produced a strategic roadmap prioritising savings opportunities by impact and feasibility.
Phase 2 — Sourcing Strategy Execution (c.9 months): Five levers were deployed simultaneously: competitive strategic sourcing to identify best-in-class suppliers; specification optimisation to remove unnecessary requirements without compromising safety or quality; supplier consolidation to reduce fragmentation; demand management to challenge volume assumptions and eliminate unnecessary spend; and direct negotiations using spend insight to secure stronger commercial terms. A supplier conference brought together over 50 key supplier organisations to communicate the new strategy and vision, focused on service, efficiency, and innovation.
Targeted training and coaching ran throughout, upskilling contract managers to break established inertia and embed a culture of ongoing commercial accountability.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
Beyond Core Contracting: Building High-Margin, Data-Led Service Propositions for a Major Infrastructure Services Provider
Outcomes
- Three validated, margin-enhancing propositions developed and refined from a wide longlist — each assessed against margin potential, readiness, scalability, and time to revenue, and confirmed as in-demand with water utility clients
- Full commercial toolkit delivered, ready for immediate business development use: proposition packs, sales collateral deck, playbooks, roadmaps, and stakeholder maps across target utilities
- 35 senior stakeholder interviews conducted across four major UK water companies, generating direct insight into client pain points and what they value from the client as a delivery partner
- Comprehensive stakeholder maps produced identifying budget holders and decision-makers across target utilities
- Client gained a materially improved understanding of how water utilities actually perceive its capabilities — a significant blind spot prior to the engagement
Our Client
A major UK infrastructure services provider with established contracting operations across the water sector. Recognised as a strong delivery partner for core capital works, the client had identified an opportunity to evolve its proposition — moving beyond volume-based contracting into higher-margin, outcome-based services that better addressed the pressures facing water utilities in AMP8.
Background
UK water companies are facing unprecedented operational and financial pressure in AMP8. Regulator scrutiny and penalties are rising, Total Cost of Operations is under the microscope, and a historic industry focus on large capital schemes has left gaps in maintenance and operational delivery that utilities are increasingly looking to address. The client recognised that its existing model — operationally strong but largely transactional — left significant margin on the table and exposed it to commoditisation. It needed to identify which adjacent, data-led opportunities were genuinely in demand, commercially viable, and within reach — and to build the capability to pursue them.
Curzon Approach
Curzon partnered with the client across four workstreams to take the engagement from market insight to commercial-ready propositions:
Market Intelligence and Client Insight — We conducted 35 interviews with senior stakeholders across Anglian, Thames, Southern, and Yorkshire Water to map client pain points, identify opportunity spaces, and understand how the client was genuinely perceived by its customers. AI tools were used to accelerate insight generation — summarising transcripts, clustering themes, and extracting recurring client needs at pace. Competitor offerings and regulatory positions were assessed to sharpen opportunity prioritisation.
Opportunity Identification and Validation — A structured scan of core-adjacent opportunities was conducted, with propositions assessed against four criteria: margin potential, readiness, scalability, and time to revenue. A wide longlist was refined to three high-impact, client-ready propositions aligned to AMP8 priorities.
Co-creation and Proposition Development — Joint Curzon-client workshops brought internal stakeholders together across divisions to stress-test and shape commercially viable propositions. Co-creation built internal ownership and accelerated validation — ensuring the final propositions reflected both client demand and the client’s genuine delivery capability.
Commercial Enablement and Playbook Delivery — Each proposition was supported by a full commercial toolkit: a proposition pack setting out the what, how, and why; a playbook translating proposition into route to market; a roadmap illustrating the path to commercial delivery; and a stakeholder map identifying the right decision-makers and budget holders at each target utility. A consolidated sales collateral deck was produced to support business development conversations and sharpen market positioning.
CASE STUDIES
Read some of the client problems we have solved!
Defining What a Resilient Airport Looks Like — and Building the Framework to Get There
Outcomes
- Delivered a clear, shared definition of resilience across a complex, multi-stakeholder airport ecosystem — replacing fragmented and conflicting interpretations held across operations, investment, and planning functions
- Produced a structured resilience assessment framework to evaluate future masterplan options against objective criteria
- Identified specific priority improvement areas: horizontal risk management, clearer resilience appetite, stronger end-to-end operational thinking, and better alignment between capacity, cost, and service outcomes
- Established a set of resilience factors — including robustness, reliability, redundancy, and incident command — to stress-test future infrastructure investment decisions
- Provided the client with a practical basis for turning difficult operational flow days into good ones, with clear requirements for what airport users and partners need to deliver resilient outcomes consistently
Our Client
One of the world’s busiest and most complex airports, operating at near-maximum capacity and planning significant long-term expansion. The client needed to strengthen operational resilience across its entire ecosystem — spanning terminals, airfield operations, ground handlers, airlines, and infrastructure partners — while simultaneously preparing for the demands of a major capacity expansion programme.
Background
Earlier diagnostic work had revealed a fundamental problem: resilience meant different things to different parts of the organisation. For some, it meant punctuality. For others, recovery speed, capacity headroom, customer experience, or brand protection. Without a shared definition, investment decisions, operational planning, and expansion masterplanning were being made against inconsistent standards. The client needed a single, coherent view of what resilience meant in practice — and what it would take to deliver it reliably, particularly during periods of operational stress or disruption.
Curzon Approach
Curzon combined three workstreams to develop a grounded, practical resilience framework:
- Stakeholder Engagement and Diagnostic — We conducted senior stakeholder interviews across the airport ecosystem to surface the range of resilience definitions in use and understand where gaps, conflicts, and dependencies lay. This was combined with a current-state assessment of the airport’s resilience position against objective criteria.
- Resilience Definition and Framework Design — We synthesised the multiple definitions into a single, practical resilience framework tailored to the airport context. This included defining resilience factors — robustness, reliability, redundancy, and incident command — that could be applied consistently across operational, organisational, infrastructure, and technology dimensions.
- Workshops and Masterplan Translation — We ran a structured AWG12 resilience workshop with the client and its ecosystem partners to identify what would need to be true operationally, organisationally, and technologically to turn difficult flow days into good ones. These insights were then translated into resilience outcomes and requirements to inform and stress-test future masterplan options.
- Existing strengths — including the Airport Operations Centre (APOC), leadership commitment, and rapid organisational learning — were identified and built upon, rather than overlooked in pursuit of a purely new model.














